Remember the good old days, when you had to step outside of almost every building to use your cell phone?
Today, you don’t have to do that because cellular signal boosters are in just about every major office building, shopping mall and sports venue you visit. Plus, they are used in hundreds of thousands of smaller buildings, such as homes, small offices, lake houses and cabins, in addition to vehicles.
The FCC has issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) concerning the manufacture and use of cell phone signal boosters because some manufacturer’s signal boosters cause interference with the carrier’s towers. This forces other people’s calls to be dropped.
One proposal before the FCC would require all existing signal boosters to be shut down and replaced by new ones. Most people, however, believe that the consumer, who is actually paying for the signals they use, should be able to boost the signals inside buildings, etc., so long as they do not cause cell phone tower issues.
To require a blanket replacement of all existing boosters would force consumers to spend tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to replace equipment that functions perfectly and causes no interference. These unnecessary replacement costs would put a financial and logistical burden on the public for no good reason. It would also place those who cannot afford to switch out their boosters in undue jeopardy during emergencies.
This is, in fact, a life or death matter.
A saner, alternative proposal issued by the American signal booster manufacturer, Wilson Electronics and one of the largest US service providers, Verizon Wireless, agree on new technical specifications for consumer cellular boosters. The two companies have joined together to urge FCC commissioners to adopt these specifications.
The other cellular carriers and their industry lobby, CTIA, do not support the Wilson-Verizon joint proposal. They continue their efforts to make any new booster standards expensive to implement and a burden for consumers.
“There is no doubt that signal boosters are a necessity for business, pleasure and, most importantly, safety,” says Sherry Unruh, a seventeen year sales representative with Wilson Electronics. “The only question should be how, not if, they can be made widely available to the public without inference to cellular towers. We’ve proved for years that they can be. Our eleven electrical engineers staff have made sure that our products simply do not interfere with cell phone towers”
Jeff Brackenridge, owner of the only exclusive Wilson Electronics dealership in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area, UnwiredSignal.com, says, “For the last ten years we have designed and sold signal booster kits for NASA, the US Border Patrol, most branches of the US Military, the US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA, Fortune 100 companies, and even hospital operating rooms. Wilson Electronics’ signal boosters don’t interfere with cell phone towers and we’ve sold tens of thousands of them, from large, complex applications to home and cabins with no complaints from service providers or the FCC to prove it.
“Also, thousands of seniors depend upon cell phones exclusively, with the help of signal boosters, because they can’t afford both cellular and landline service. These, too, would have to be turned off and new ones purchased. Many seniors just can’t afford that.”
“Even though a law requiring the replacement of existing cellular signal boosters would create a boom for our business, we believe it would be arbitrary, unnecessary, and grossly unfair to current users of cell phone signal boosters,” said David Jones, who has been with UnwiredSignal.com since its inception, in 2001.
“We urge people who currently depend upon cell phone signal boosters for cell phone service inside their buildings and vehicles to go to the FCC website and make their voices heard. The FCC is ready and willing to listen to saner ideas, some of which the FCC, itself, has proposed.”
The FCC continues to accept public comments until Aug. 24. They are accepting comments on the proposal until August 24, 2011 at: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/hotdocket/list?z=gegjf